切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华关节外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2025, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (01) : 102 -108. doi: 10.3877/ cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2025.01.015

临床经验

新型组合式锁定钢板治疗股骨髓内钉术后骨不连
刘圆1, 夏琪鹏1, 徐洪涛1, 程建和1, 王建平1, 冯皓1, 周江军2, 赵敏1,()   
  1. 1. 335000 鹰潭市人民医院骨科
    2. 330000 南昌,联勤保障部队第九〇八医院骨科
  • 收稿日期:2024-07-19 出版日期:2025-02-01
  • 通信作者: 赵敏
  • 基金资助:
    军队后勤科研计划(CLB19J041)江西省卫健委省直卫生健康单位项目(20203826)鹰潭市“鹰才计划”科技创新人才资助项目(20233-356465)

New assembly locking compression platein postoperative bone nonunion following intramedullary nailing of femur

Yuan Liu1, Qipeng Xia1, Hongtao Xu1, Jianhe Cheng1, Jianping Wang1, Hao Feng1, Jiangjun Zhou2, Min Zhao1,()   

  1. 1. Dept of Orthopaedics, Yingtan People’s Hospital, Yingtan 335000, China
    2. Department of Orthopedics, 908th Hospital of Joint Logistics Support Force, Nanchang 330000, China
  • Received:2024-07-19 Published:2025-02-01
  • Corresponding author: Min Zhao
引用本文:

刘圆, 夏琪鹏, 徐洪涛, 程建和, 王建平, 冯皓, 周江军, 赵敏. 新型组合式锁定钢板治疗股骨髓内钉术后骨不连[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 102-108.

Yuan Liu, Qipeng Xia, Hongtao Xu, Jianhe Cheng, Jianping Wang, Hao Feng, Jiangjun Zhou, Min Zhao. New assembly locking compression platein postoperative bone nonunion following intramedullary nailing of femur[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(01): 102-108.

目的

观察评价新型组合式锁定钢板治疗股骨髓内钉术后骨不连的疗效。

方法

将22例股骨髓内钉术后骨不连患者根据治疗方式不同分为观察组和对照组;观察组11例采用新型组合式锁定钢板(NALCP)固定治疗,对照组11例采用锁定加压钢板(LCP)治疗。记录置入螺钉数量、螺钉固定皮质层数、术中出血量、骨折愈合时间、术后第1、3、6个月下肢功能评分、术后1月视觉模拟评分法(VAS)、末次膝关节HSS评分、髋关节Harris评分评价疗效。两组不同时间点比较使用重复测量方差分析,然后采用Bonferroni多重比较;两组间比较计量资料采用独立样本t检验,计数资料比较采用确切概率法检验。

结果

术后第1、3、6个月、1年进行随访。观察组中的置入螺钉、螺钉固定皮质层数量均多于对照组,两者比较差异具有统计学意义(t=19.030、12.245,均为P<0.001),术中出血量(t=-10.564)、骨折愈合时间(t=-30.869)观察组均少(短)于对照组(均为P<0.001)。术后第1、3、6个月观察组下肢功能评分均高于对照组(t=27.111、61.968、9.553,均为P<0.001);术后1个月VAS评分观察组均低于对照组(t=-6.847,P<0.001),两组末次膝关节HSS评分及髋关节Harris评分差异均无统计学意义(t=1.580、0.830,均为P>0.05)。

结论

在保留原有髓内钉的基础上,与LCP相比,使用NALCP作为附加钢板治疗股骨髓内钉术后骨不连可以有效增强断端的稳定性,保护局部血供,减少手术创伤,骨折断端愈合速度更快,改善患者下肢功能恢复和降低患者疼痛,生活质量更佳。

Objective

To evaluate the clinical efficacy of a new assembly locking compression plate in the treatment of femoral nonunion after intramedullary nailing.

Methods

Twenty-two patients with nonunion following femoral intramedullary nailing surgery were divided into an observation group and a control group according to different treatment approaches.In the observation group, 11 cases were treated with the new assembly locking compression plate (NALCP) fixation, while 11 cases in the control group received treatment with the locking compression plate (LCP).The following parameters were recorded and compared: number of inserted screws, cortical fixation layers achieved by screws, intraoperative blood loss, fracture healing time,lower limb function scores (assessed at one, three, and six months postoperatively), visual analog scale (VAS)scores at one month after operation, final Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) knee scores, and Harris hip scores(HHS) to evaluate clinical outcomes.Statistical analyses were performed as follows: comparisons across different time points between the two groups were analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post hoc test; comparisons of continuous data between groups was conducted by independen t test, while categorical data were assessed using Fisher’s exact test.

Results

Patients were followed up postoperatively at one, three,and six months, and one year.The observation group demonstrated a greater number of inserted screws (t=19.030,P<0.001) and cortical fixation layers achieved by screws (t=12.245, P<0.001) compared to the control group,with both differences reaching statistical significance.The observation group exhibited less intraoperative blood loss (t=-10.564, P<0.001) and shorter fracture healing time (t=-30.869, P<0.001) compared to the control group.Compared to the control group, the observation group showed higher lower limb function scores at one, three, and six months after operation (t=27.111, 61.968, 9.553, all P<0.001).The observation group exhibited lower VAS scores at one month after operation compared to the control group (t=-6.847, P<0.001).No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups in the final HSS knee scores or HHS (t=1.580, 0.830, all P>0.05).

Conclusions

Compared to LCP, NALCP as an adjunctive fixation for femoral nonunion following intramedullary nailing demonstrates superior clinical efficacy.By retaining the original intramedullary nail, NALCP provides enhanced fracture stability through multi-dimensional fixation while preserving local blood supply due to its anatomical design.This approach minimizes surgical trauma,accelerates fracture union, improves lower limb functional recovery, reduces early postoperative pain, and enhances patients’ quality of life.

图1 课题组自主设计研制的NALCP(新型组合式锁定加压钢板)(专利号:ZL 2012 2 0339335.2)
Figure 1 NALCP(new design assembly locking compression plate) is independently designed and developed by the research group(Patent Number: ZL 2012 2 0339335.2)
表1 两组术前一般资料比较
Table 1 Comparison of the preoperative general data between the two groups
表2 两组手术情况比较(±s
Table 2 Surgical data comparison of the two groups
表3 两组下肢功能评分比较(±s
Table 3 Comparison of lower limb function scores between the two groups
表4 两组术后随访疼痛及功能评分比较(±s
Table 4 Comparison of pain and function scores between the two groups after surgery
图1 典型病例1 行NALCP(新型组合式锁定加压钢板)固定手术前后情况。图A 为入院时右股骨正侧位X 线片,图B 为入院时右股骨CT 三维重建,示股骨髓内钉术后骨不连,骨折断端骨折线清晰;图C 为NALCP 固定术中外观照;图D 为术中右股骨X 线透视,图E 为术后复查右股骨正侧位X 线片,示髓内钉保留,骨折断端远近端各置入5 枚螺钉增强骨折端稳定性;图F 为术后1 月复查右股骨正侧位X 线片,示NALCP 固定骨不连区域可见骨痂,钢板及螺钉位置良好;图G 为术后3 个月右股骨正侧位X 线片,示骨不连区域大量骨痂生成,骨折线模糊;图H 为术后6 个月右股骨X 线正侧位片,图I 为术后6 个月右股骨CT,示骨不连区域已骨性愈合,骨折线消失;图J 为患者术后6 个月快速负重行走外观照
Figure 1 Images of typical case one before and after NALCP(new design assembly locking compression plate) surgery.A is the X ray image at anteroposterior and lateral views of right femur at admission, B is CT image of three dimensional reconstruction of the right femur at admission, both showing non-union bone fracture of right femur with obvious fracture line after intramedullary nail fixation; C is image during NALCP surgery; D is X-ray image of right femur during surgery, E is X ray image at anteroposterior and lateral views of right femur after surgery, both showing that the intramedullary nail was retained, and five screws were placed at the near and far end of the fracture end to enhance the stability; F is X-ray image at anteroposterior and lateral views of right femur at one month after surgery, showing that callus could be seen in the non-union area fixed by NALCP , and the plate and screws were in good positions ; G is X-ray image at anteroposterior and lateral views of right femur three months after surgery, showing massive bone callus growth and blurred fracture line; H is X-ray image at anteroposterior and lateral views of right femur six months after surgery, I is CT image of the right femur six months after surgery,showing that the bone nonunion area was healed and the fracture line disappeared; J is the appearance photo of rapid weight-bearing walking at six months after surgery
图2 典型病例2 行LCP(锁定钢板)固定术前后左股骨X 线正侧位片。图A 为术前X 线片,示股骨髓内钉固定术后骨不连;图B 为术后第1 天X 线片,示骨不连断端对位对线好,锁定钢板、髓内钉固定在位;图C 为术后6 个月X 线片,示骨不连断端少许骨痂生长;图D 为术后1 年X 线片,示骨不连断端大量骨痂生长,骨折线模糊;图E 为术后18 个月X 线片,示锁定钢板、髓内钉在位,骨折线消失、断端骨性愈合
Figure 2 X ray images at anteroposterior and lateral views of left femur of typical case two before and after LCP(locking compression plate) fixation.A is X ray image before surgery, showing non-union left femoral fracture with intramedullary nail fixation; B is X-ray image at first day after LCP surgery, showing that the locking plate and intramedullary nail were fixed in right position; C is X-ray image six months after surgery, showing some bone callus growth; D is X-ray image one year after surgery showing the growth of massive callus and the blurred fracture line; E is X-ray image at 18 months after surgery, showing that the locking plate and the intramedullary nail were in position, the fracture line disappeared and the bone fracture healed
[1]
郝治龙, 樊俊俊, 张少宁, 等.股骨干骨折术后骨不连的相关危险因素分析[J].中华创伤骨科杂志, 2022, 24( 9 ): 824-828.
[2]
Mardani-Kivi M, KarimiMobarakeh M, Keyhani S, et al.Double-plate fixation together with bridging bone grafting in nonunion of femoral supracondylar, subtrochanteric, and shaft fractures is an effective technique[J].MusculoskeletSurg, 2020, 104( 2 ): 215-226.
[3]
Concha JM, Osma JL, FantínE, et al.Augmentative lag screws as a treatment for aseptic hypertrophic nonunion after internal fracture fixation[J/OL].Injury, 2023, 54( Suppl 6 ): 110805.DOI:10.1016/j.injury.2023.05.036.
[4]
叶浩波, 孙亮, 刘路, 等.2013年至2020年西安交通大学医学院附属红会医院股骨干无菌性骨不连的基本特征与相关治疗分析[J].中华创伤骨科杂志, 2022, 24( 12 ): 1049-1054.
[5]
李成磊.股骨干骨折后戒烟能减少骨不连[J/CD].中华关节外科杂志( 电子版 ), 2020, 14( 1 ): 111-114.
[6]
Nicholson JA, Makaram N, Simpson A, et al.Fracture nonunion in long bones: a literature review of risk factors and surgical managemen[tJ].Injury, 2021, 52( Suppl 2 ): S3-S11.
[7]
Garcia TA, de Andrade ALL, Von Keudell AG, et al.No dose response effect in shockwave therapy applied to bone conditions: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression[J].J Orthop,2024, 49: 90-101.
[8]
Kook I, Park KC, Kim DH, et al.A multicenter study of factors affecting nonunion by radiographic analysis after intramedullary nailing in segmental femoral shaft fractures[J/OL].Sci Rep, 2023,13( 1 ): 7802.DOI:10.1038/s41598-023-34939-6.
[9]
Uliana CS, Bidolegui F, Kojima K, et al.Augmentation plating leaving the nail in situ is an excellent option for treating femoral shaft nonunion after IM nailing: a multicentrestudy[J].EurJ Trauma EmergSurg, 2021, 47( 6 ): 1895-1901.
[10]
中华医学会骨科学分会创伤骨科学组, 中华医学会骨科学分会外固定与肢体重建学组, 北京医学会显微外科分会.中国自体骨移植临床实践指南( 2024版 )[J].中华医学杂志, 2024, 104( 35 ): 3307-3322.
[11]
张伟, 李建涛, 聂少波, 等.多维交叉锁定接骨板治疗股骨干髓内钉术后骨不连的临床疗效研究[J].中华骨与关节外科杂志,2021, 14( 4 ): 292-297.
[12]
Deliberato D, Myers DM, Schnee B, et al.Weight bearing as tolerated after intramedullary nailing of the femur: a retrospective analysis of clinical and radiographic outcomes[J/OL].Orthopedics, 2022, 45( 3 ): e148-e153.DOI:10.3928/01477447-20220105-10.
[13]
程彬, 史柏娜, 周江军, 等.低弹性模量新型组合式锁定加压钢板固定股骨粉碎性骨折的生物力学研究[J].中华创伤骨科杂志, 2018, 20( 9 ): 798-802.
[14]
桂钱欢, 赵敏, 肖春林, 等.新型组合式锁定加压钢板治疗股骨干粉碎性骨折的生物力学研究[J].中华创伤杂志, 2018, 34( 5 ):426-431.
[15]
刘圆, 易蕊, 余专一, 等.新型组合式锁定钢板治疗股骨开放性粉碎性骨折临床效果观察[J].临床军医杂志, 2021, 49( 7 ):734-737.
[1] 杨尚晟, 刘义, 王伟, 李嘉, 王键, 田明昊, 吴迪. 腓骨远端后侧与外侧钢板治疗外踝骨折的有限元分析[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 736-741.
[2] 李焕玺, 何淳诺, 田志敏, 周胜虎, 吴昊越, 张浩强. 全膝关节置换术后股骨远端假体周围骨折治疗现状[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 630-637.
[3] 唐小花, 孙建霞, 王君, 王美青. 预测老年股骨粗隆间骨折术后并发症的列线图模型构建[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(06): 677-682.
[4] 朱圣旺, 覃志, 韦钧译, 石泽锋, 李书振. 关节镜下双带襻钢板技术治疗肩锁关节脱位[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(01): 99-103.
[5] 王北洋, 王仁伟, 胡宇奇, 任伟平, 张志强. 全膝关节置换术中股骨前皮质切迹的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(06): 707-711.
[6] 徐掭发, 詹科, 谢燕花, 胡俊勇, 刘建华. 防旋股骨近端髓内钉在老年股骨粗隆间骨折的应用[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(01): 7-11.
[7] 莫征然, 周干溪, 王井旺, 郭春荣. 微创锁定加压钢板术治疗胫腓骨远端骨折[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(03): 334-338.
[8] 丁伟, 王小军, 封小东. 复杂胫骨平台骨折双切口双钢板内固定术的疗效[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(03): 320-323.
[9] 张琳袁, 吴佳俊, 崔煦, 沈超, 付备刚, 崔崟, 王秀会, 蔡攀. 大结节解剖钢板与PHILOS内固定治疗伴肩关节脱位的Mutch I/II型肱骨大结节骨折的疗效差异[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(02): 139-145.
[10] 张晓萌, 陈征, 陈杰, 张殿英, 熊建. 如何使用术中超声探测肱骨近端板钉固定后的螺钉穿透:一项初步尸体研究[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2021, 09(01): 48-54.
[11] 赵清斌, 殷剑, 肖伟, 孙俊刚, 周文正. 异体皮质骨板结合髂骨植骨辅助钢板治疗肱骨干骨折骨不连的短期临床疗效[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(03): 152-156.
[12] 王栋, 张乐, 乔虎云, 刘宏, 王宝娜, 李岩, 王钞崎, 李超, 贾英伟, 张永红. 分期治疗股骨骨折术后慢性骨髓炎的临床疗效研究[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2022, 08(04): 197-204.
[13] 王建华, 林艳, 吴永东, 王有宝. 经皮撬拨复位内固定技术对难复性股骨粗隆间骨折老年患者NE、AngⅡ水平及髋关节功能的影响[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2021, 07(01): 9-14.
[14] 丰瑞兵, 王华松, 庞炯宇, 姜壮, 蔡贤华. 锁定钢板加克氏针埋头技术(Lost K-wire)治疗伴关节面塌陷的尺骨鹰嘴骨折的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2020, 06(06): 334-339.
[15] 王喜安, 姜为民, 张凡, 蒋伟刚, 何罕亮. 对比分析单侧锁定与双侧锁定接骨板联合皮质剥离术植骨治疗股骨干骨折不愈合患者疗效及关节功能的影响[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(12): 972-977.
阅读次数
全文


摘要